A closer look at the work behind our track record — engineering and compliance engagements for utilities, generation owners, and OEMs.
Offshore wind interconnection involves more coordinating parties than a typical onshore project — a regional reliability entity, an ISO, and a local utility all have a say in how and where the project connects.
We supported the interconnection strategy in direct coordination with NPCC, ISO-NE, and Eversource, working across their respective requirements rather than treating each as a separate, sequential hurdle.
A coordinated interconnection strategy that reflected the requirements of all three stakeholders from the outset.
Energy storage and microgrid programs in California, Hawaii, and Texas each carry distinct grid conditions, utility requirements, and program structures — a single playbook doesn't transfer cleanly between them.
We provided technical leadership across these programs and pilots individually, adapting the underlying engineering approach to each state's specific requirements and grid characteristics.
Technical continuity across a multi-state storage and microgrid portfolio, despite each program's distinct regulatory and technical context.
An OEM needed to demonstrate that a generator set's automatic voltage regulator and governor response met the German grid code's low- and high-voltage ride-through (LVRT/HVRT) requirements.
We modeled the AVR/governor response and validated it directly against LVRT and HVRT field test data, certifying the equipment's compliance with the applicable grid code.
Certified compliance the OEM could present to customers and regulators, backed by field-test-validated modeling.
Utility-scale wind and solar integration programs needed both the interconnection studies themselves and the in-house capability to keep running similar studies going forward.
We directed PSCAD, PSS/E, and TSAT-based interconnection studies for the integration program, and delivered training alongside the study work so client staff could build on it directly.
Completed interconnection studies plus a client team better equipped to run similar studies independently.
Demonstrating step-change and fast frequency response (FFR) compliance requires testing real controllers and relays against realistic grid conditions — not just a paper simulation.
We built and ran a hardware-in-the-loop test bed on RTDS, incorporating actual power plant controllers, meters, load tap changers, and SEL RTACs, and used it to run the step-change and FFR compliance tests directly against the hardware.
Compliance testing validated against real hardware response, not just simulated behavior.
Tell us what you're working on, and we'll let you know how our experience applies.